From confused content of the decree "Milleproroghe" obvious symbol of the inability of the legislature to set a credible issues of public concern, the figure that emerges strongly is superficial and contradictory approach of the government in terms of social policies and tendentious interpretation of the idea of \u200b\u200bsubsidiarity.
first victims of this confusion legislation will be the rights of persons protected under the same constitutional
many Italian citizens are informed of the approval of the decree 'Milleproroghe' and, above all, its content confusissimo, after four months of substantial paralysis parliamentary activity? Most likely very few. Fortunately, the initiative of the Head of State has helped to give a little 'visibility to a well-established in the legislative malpractice of our institutions. But the notes to go even beyond those that Napolitano could be done in the exercise of its functions.
Even the name 'Milleproroghe' clearly shows the ineffettività legificazione in Italy. The terms of the law are made to be respected, not to be extended. Each extension, however, nail the government for its failures. Or reveals the inability of the legislature to regulate in a credible way the issues of public concern. In essence, "Milleproroghe" might also mean with "Milleritardi" or "Milleinadempienze" names that represent the attitude of a politico-administrative class used to send messages contrary to the culture of the rules. And so in our country, the idea that a deadline does not mean anything, because normally it is intended to be extended. And when the time limit has expired, intervene to reopen the policy.
A confusing
content is easy to understand why such measures are written in an incomprehensible way. To remove the legal certainty it is necessary to spread a smoke opacity, the procedure must be drawn up in haste and sloppy, the provisions piled up in the sign of the disorder. In this indigestible mistione, create spaces for the raids of the most mediocre lobbying (as in the restoration of the monopoly that the Italian Swimming Federation to issue a license to its suitability for lifeguards ...) and the content of individual standards to become dark general citizens. Their meaning will be intelligible only to those who wrote them and their 'principals'.
The subject of "Milleproroghe" of course, includes materials (and ugliness) is most unlikely: a sort of creeping amnesty for 600 illegal houses in Campania, tax relief for banks. And then, in any order: a tax on cinema tickets, extension or reopening of the subject in terms of blood transfusion services, waste disposal, tax providences of the earthquake and the eruption of Mount Etna Aquila, financing of Port Authorities , management of school staff, of destruction of motor vehicles for international cooperation of Police, assisted reproduction, navigation in the lakes of Lombardy, blocking evictions, television broadcasting, information technology Judicial, handguns, and so forth . There is the usual norm in support of patronage: the mayor Alemanno, as part of measures to 'Rome capital', gets assessors in three more (and justifies them with a greater openness to women ....). Do not miss even a suspension of payment of milk quotas in favor of defaulting Po ...
The decree and the social rights of citizens
But the contradictions are more severe as those experienced by the social rights of citizens. On the one hand, the text continued validity reasons the deadline (March 31, 2011) for the transition to the ordinary regime of free professional intramural, ie the possibility to exercise their activities by physicians authorized by the outside working hours, at the facilities of the National Health Service or from their private practice. For some time the regions have the necessary funds to ensure this step, designed to provide citizens with transparency in access to care, improved quality and safety.
other hand, confirm the decision not to refinance in 2011 (and therefore not 'extend') the national fund for long-term care seems yet another act of indifference to the most vulnerable and their families. The Government has shown scant attention to social policies and deaf to the demands of civic organizations and the protection of the same regions. The lack of full funding at the national level creates inequalities: the citizens residing in regions unable to finance themselves interventions may access their benefits, others are not. Moreover, it is inevitable the increasing health care costs, and assumption of private costs for Italian families.
Subsidiarity poor quality
Another initiative that has shocked the refurbishment of the social card, which is closely linked to a specious interpretation of the idea of \u200b\u200bsubsidiarity. With this measure the government attaches to unspecified charities in charge of assigning the contribution. Now, beyond the capacity of this measure to solve the problem of poverty in Italy, the method chosen to achieve it leaves too many unanswered questions. How do I select the charities? And then, as these institutions will select the recipients of assistance? What criteria are used? As will be compensated for this service to people because nothing is expected in this area? One could go on. Many observers fear already, rightly, that in the folds of such a rule could be hiding a sticky area made of irresponsibility, of de facto inequalities and lack of transparency. In short, a really bad way to implement the subsidiarity. The risk, however, to cast a shadow of discredit on the practice subsidiary of the realities of civil society. But this is not surprising. After all, the White Paper on Welfare - which Labsus has already criticized in the past - had already set the stage for this mess and inappropriate solutions. Conclusions
short, in the light of these considerations, the 'Milleproroghe' - imposed by the government in the hits' maximemendamenti'-is doubly objectionable. First of all, because for the poor quality of the legislative product, we are faced with a real 'harassment' against Italian citizens. But mainly because the first victims of this confusion legislation will be especially the rights of persons protected under the same constitutional requirements, including the last paragraph of Article .118.
0 comments:
Post a Comment